Showing posts with label nymphomania. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nymphomania. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Sex is Awkward
You might think that the natural companion to sex with a new lover is satisfaction, right? That might be partially true, but awkwardness will be an acquaintance for at least part of that journey.
Sex is the natural outflow of physical attraction and desire, like a volcano combines crustal weakness and hot magma. Mmmmmmm, magma. Volcanoes, unlike us, aren't raised to have self-awareness, which means that they don't get embarrassed when they leak molten rock all over the duvet. A spurting volcanic eruption, wide open caldera, full-throated screaming and frantic bubbling are the hallmarks of vociferous volcanology.
Once the pressure is released, so to speak, there exists a gap in time where the passion subsides, and reality returns. My thinking is that the awkwardness we feel in that immediate aftermath of an...eruption is part embarrassment at revealing our unvarnished, animal side, and part wondering whether our new partner thinks we're okay.
Will they think enough of us to come check out our geophysics a second time, or will they just want to toss us a bunch of virgins?
Bottoms Up, Hot Pockets of Love.
Labels:
awkwardness,
evolution,
hot women,
love,
new lover,
nymphomania,
self-awareness,
self-knowledge,
sex,
virginity,
volcanology
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Can we leave the light on?

Laughable.
Can we leave the light on?
Well, yeah, otherwise how will I be able to see what I'm doing?
Bottoms Up, Ninjas!
Ronin thanks to [link]
Labels:
bad sex,
coupling,
erection,
generalizations,
lust,
ninja,
nymphomania,
proposition,
stud,
submission
Monday, May 31, 2010
Nymphomania

Nymphomania is more or less the same as insatiability, I guess, although there must be some degree of difference. Perhaps insatiables do it with one person, and nymphomaniacs do it with anyone.
Whatever it is, I hope that the word is no longer a term of approbation. Nymphomania used to have the clinical descriptor 'furor uterinus' whereas thesedays it's called 'hypersexuality'. It's still considered an abnormality, but it's one you can wear on your sleeve.
I knew a girl once who was a sort of oral nymphomaniac. She wouldn't engage in intercourse with any one but a steady boyfriend, but she'd happily fellate any fella who asked. She turned up at my place one night, late, jumped into bed with me, had her way and left. If that sounds like a Hustler letter, it's not meant to, because it's true.
I think it was a hobby - instead of a notch on her bedpost, she had another swallow.
Whatever. None of the guys I knew who were in the 'Kate Club' considered her a nympho, and in fact we all conducted regular social intercourse with her. It was just her thing. Indeed, had she been a full-blown all-out nympho, we'd never use the word as a pejorative - we'd just want a piece of the action.
But maybe that's just my experience. I wonder if women with strong sex-drives are still feared by men, rather than seen as someone to whom the red-blooded man introduces himself.
Bottoms Up, Nymphos!
Labels:
blowjobs,
insatiable,
nymphomania,
sex,
sexuality,
shibboleths
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)